If you see something like this, DO NOT CALL AN EXTERMINATOR!
Call a beekeeper, they can relocate the hive instead of killing them. Bees are dying at an alarming rate, please do not contribute to that! They are so important for our ecosystem!
yo fuck this i aint gonna call no beekeeper i’m moving before i’m dead
I’m going to call an exterminator so the exterminator can kill them. I’ll be able to sleep at night knowing that there are less bees in the world.
No bees = no food.
No food = no life.
Congratulations on destroying the world.
Because you seem to not understand that bees pollinate flowers and literally bees are the reason we have food.
“If a woman wants to see the nature of a man, tell him “No.””—
Bev Jo (via marjchaos)
And then you’ll see that it’s really men who are the irrational and hyper-emotional ones (p.s., anger is an emotion and males with an entitlement complex excel at expressing it, especially towards women and girls who don’t or refuse to succumb to his bullshit).
You know how many man tantrums I have seen adult men have upon hearing no?
A wormhole? A GIANT spaceship? An intergalactic disco? None, actually.
This is, believe it or not, a real photo taken by the Chandra x-ray observatory. The central object is a quasar, RX J1131-1231 (RX J1131 for short), located about 6 billion light years from Earth.
According to Chandra, "Gravitational lensing by an intervening elliptical galaxy has created four different images of the quasar, shown by the Chandra data in pink.”
It’s certainly one of the clearest images of this effect we’ve seen in a while, and one of the sparkliest!
More info at http://chandra.si.edu/photo/2014/rxj1131/
[Image: A map drawn according to the Fuller Projection in which the continents are accurately sized and not distributed according to northern and southern hemispheres but are actually projected as if seen from above, make them very closely grouped together and more accurately sized.]
Can we just take a moment to appreciate the Fuller Projection?
This map presents a world that is nearly contiguous and at accurate sizes and shapes to the continents.
And there is no “correct” orientation for it (the directionality of north/south being arbitrary after all )
The downsides are that it cuts up Antarctica and distorts the size of oceans, which is bad news for sailors and penguin researchers, but for geography in general it’s AWESOME(X)
I seriously love the Fuller Projection because - through no fault of their own - millions of kids go through school systems in so many places (not just the U.S.) with Mercator projection maps that are drawn such that they make North America and Europe look much bigger than they’ve ever really been in actual, factual reality. That projection reduces Africa to being the same size as Greenland.
You look at that big white mass hovering above Canada in this map and then look at the immense, enormous, magnificent size of Africa, or of South America which has never, ever been smaller than North America. That’s what reality is. We’re seriously teaching kids to go by a map that is not representative of the physical reality of the planet upon which we live.
Every time I see Fuller maps I just wanna go marching back to the school systems I went through with a fiery vengeance and a bullhorn, screaming through the halls, “EXPLAIN THIS BULLSHIT” and then encourage the current students to also demand of their teachers and school systems and parents and other adults who have been miseducating them for years that they EXPLAIN THIS BULLSHIT and not stop until the bullshit is explained.
That’s not the Fuller Projection (which, wow, yes it was invented by THAT Buckminster Fuller!). It’s the Pierce Quincunical. The P-Q isn’t an equal-area projection: it slightly enlarges the equatorial areas, including Africa and South America, and you can tell if you look closely at the circles of latitude.
^^This is the Fuller Projection, aka the Dymaxion Map. It isn’t quite equal-area either. Honestly, most equal-area maps look ugly as hell, but I’d say the least ugly one is the Goode-Homolosine:
Comparing all three, you can see that the landmasses are slightly different on each, and in terms of relative sizes, the GH is the only ‘right’ one. But there’s something great about the other two. They get the shapes right. They show how the continents connect, which is great for paleoanthropology. North isn’t at the top, in fact they do away with the whole nonsense of the Earth having a top or bottom.
They’re certainly all better than the Mercator. Hating on the Mercator is one of those fun, catharic exercises in consensus equivalent to complaining about Windows Vista.
But basically, no flat maps tell the whole truth. Even the really beautiful ones.
what if lawn mowers are so loud because they have to cover the screams of the grass being massacred.
…the weird thing is? Fresh cut grass smell is pretty much grass screaming.
Lady Sif in Thor: The Dark World